From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gtk3, emacs 24 and gnome shell Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:55:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83bot09nyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4EA554D1.1040000@gmail.com> <878voaf05x.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty6xczz2.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <8739ehfpia.fsf@gmail.com> <87hb2x5u7g.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <8762jaqi2d.fsf@gmail.com> <87bot1ljve.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871utx9duw.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkgkitj8.fsf@maru.md5i.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319878527 29326 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2011 08:55:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tassilo@member.fsf.org, rasmus@gmx.us, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 10:55:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4hG-0002GV-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:55:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4hG-00070x-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4hD-000706-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4hB-0005ht-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:55:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45850) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RK4hB-0005hi-H7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTT00900KKGQG00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:55:16 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTT009F5KS3CD70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:55:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87zkgkitj8.fsf@maru.md5i.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145746 Archived-At: > From: Michael Welsh Duggan > Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:30:03 -0400 > Cc: Tassilo Horn , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > In order to debug when running as a daemon, you need to add something > like the following to your src/.gdbinit file: > > # Follow emacs when running using --daemon. We need to follow the > # child of the daemonizing fork, and go back to following parents > # shortly afterward. > break main > commands > silent > set follow-fork-mode child > continue > end > break init_signals > commands > silent > set follow-fork-mode parent > continue > end This should be a good addition to etc/DEBUG. However, I wonder: . would "tbreak" be a better choice? . why do you need to put a breakpoint with identical commands in two different functions? isn't the code path of becoming a daemon deterministic enough to have it only in `main'?