From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug tracker automated control server message Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:45:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83bo4edlea.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5221A64B.5000207@gmx.at> <5221AB9F.7090209@gmx.at> <83fvtqdr7t.fsf@gnu.org> <5221E805.9010303@gmx.at> <87k3j22eqc.fsf@engster.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377956724 7546 80.91.229.3 (31 Aug 2013 13:45:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 13:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Engster Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 31 15:45:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VFlUU-0008FV-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:45:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFlUT-000896-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:45:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFlUM-00088A-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFlUG-0000ca-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFlUG-0000cQ-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MSE00300E6ZVU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:45:11 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MSE003QTE7AHTE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 16:45:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87k3j22eqc.fsf@engster.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163116 Archived-At: > From: David Engster > Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:04:43 +0200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > This is why the control@debbugs address should usually go in the BCC, so > that people who do a wide reply do not mail the control server by > accident. If control@debbugs goes in BCC, people will become confused about those weird commands at the beginning of the message.