From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making --with-wide-int the default Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:44:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83bnap6owk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56117F37.9060808@dancol.org> <83oag087gs.fsf@gnu.org> <83oafz70im.fsf@gnu.org> <5620AF43.4050401@cs.ucla.edu> <83k2qn6xfm.fsf@gnu.org> <5620B4FA.1000804@cs.ucla.edu> <83wptojs1r.fsf@gnu.org> <56444C66.8050506@gmx.at> <83r3jugx8g.fsf@gnu.org> <87io56nu0a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448009108 15797 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 08:45:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 09:44:59 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzhJR-00010U-O8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:44:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45982 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzhJR-0000hN-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzhJH-0000WQ-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzhJD-00006d-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzhJC-00006Y-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 03:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NY300H00UW89100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:44:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NY300HQTUYG0E50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:44:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194860 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:20:16 -0500 > > >> I think it is quite reasonable _not_ to use wide ints by > >> default on architectures with a 32-bit address space. > > +1. > > Another +1 here. John, it's time to make the decision. You have all the opinions and their rationales. If you have more questions, please ask. But we should conclude this longish discussion at some point; now sounds as good time as any. Thanks.