From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] comment-cache 223d16f 2/3: Apply `comment-depth' text properties when calling `back_comment'. Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:24:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83bn6ifirh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160308132530.861.91488@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160308183010.GB6269@acm.fritz.box> <20160309174816.GE3948@acm.fritz.box> <56E0805F.3050804@gmx.at> <8360wvo0bn.fsf@gnu.org> <56E53318.2090501@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457886325 24518 80.91.229.3 (13 Mar 2016 16:25:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 17:25:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pX-0002KO-M7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 17:25:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36724 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pX-00055N-32 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:25:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pI-00051V-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pF-0008JD-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pF-0008J7-Be; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4494 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1af8pE-0007qk-9s; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:25:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <56E53318.2090501@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:30:00 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201602 Archived-At: > From: Daniel Colascione > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 01:30:00 -0800 > > As someone who regularly works with C++ code written by people who want > to use every new language construct that comes along, cc-mode is already > barely usable from a correctness perspective. I find cc-mode's > performance adequate. A 10-second delay before Emacs responds to a single keypress (see bug#22844) is certainly not adequate performance.