From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Mac port Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 18:41:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83bmzli5b7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <57DE4 306.6060904@gmx.at> <57DE4D33.6070201@gmx.at> <57DE63EC.3010305@gmx.at> <83h99di7uq.fsf@gnu.org> <57DEAF9E.1010709@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474213312 4887 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2016 15:41:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 15:41:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 17:41:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDt-0008V0-QJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:41:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDr-0004A8-NL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:41:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDK-00049o-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDG-0008RK-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDG-0008Qy-0k; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3036 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bleDE-0004oD-3s; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:41:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <57DEAF9E.1010709@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:15:42 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207561 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:15:42 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Is it wise to have Emacs on MS-Windows behave differently in this > > regard? > > Windows doesn't support anything but pixelwise resizing of its windows. > This means that the final shape of a frame visually indicated by Windows > when mouse dragging a border or an edge would not be implemented by a > chracter size oriented Emacs. Rather, Emacs would snap window sizes > back as it did in older versions. I'm asking why it is wrong to do that in newer versions, as long as frame-resize-pixelwise is nil. Especially since we behave like that on other systems. > > (Is it even documented?) > > Look up `frame-resize-pixelwise' in the Elisp manual. But frame resizing by dragging by a mouse is a user-visible feature, not only for Lisp programmers.