From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 64-bit build on Windows Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 05:37:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83bmuy4fbt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874m0tc0gn.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87efzxn6or.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y3y5681f.fsf@gnu.org> <83h94s5kzi.fsf@gnu.org> <838tq45gsk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vat73uoc.fsf@gnu.org> <8d4cbeca-e007-da33-46bb-298f8c95efcb@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485142717 21383 195.159.176.226 (23 Jan 2017 03:38:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 03:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, lekktu@gmail.com, fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 04:38:30 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVSd-0004nV-Qo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 04:38:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38988 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVSj-00042X-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:38:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVRT-00035G-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVRP-0005yJ-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48271) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVRP-0005yF-RW; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4299 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cVVRO-0000kA-Vl; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 22:37:11 -0500 In-reply-to: <8d4cbeca-e007-da33-46bb-298f8c95efcb@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:22:48 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211573 Archived-At: > Cc: Óscar Fuentes , > Juanma Barranquero , Emacs developers > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:22:48 -0800 > > Fabrice Popineau wrote: > > Given that MSYS2 itself has switched to IM7, I don't see the point to keep > > support for IM6. > > My vague impression is that ImageMagick 7 is still too buggy on GNU/Linux to be > useful for Emacs there. Is my impression incorrect? Even if I'm wrong, Emacs > should continue to support IM6 for a while on non-MS-Windows platforms, to > support users who don't have IM7 installed yet. I agree.