From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windows build help Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:31:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83bml9iw4d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84o9pyim1a.fsf@AigleRoyal> <83r2up976t.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmlblfca.fsf@gnu.org> <877evyev8o.fsf_-_@russet.org.uk> <86a80udeid.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87376m9edg.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86wp3xbw0y.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507995122 25231 195.159.176.226 (14 Oct 2017 15:32:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 15:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 14 17:31:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPq-0005Wi-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 17:31:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54352 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPx-000100-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPr-0000yU-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:31:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPo-0003vb-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPo-0003vU-MP; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:31:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3890 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e3OPo-0002VR-18; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 11:31:52 -0400 In-reply-to: <86wp3xbw0y.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (message from Stephen Leake on Sat, 14 Oct 2017 10:15:41 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219522 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Leake > Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 10:15:41 -0500 > > Hmm. You are implying that the elc built for 32 bit emacs are identical > to the elc built for 64 bit emacs. > > Is that true? Yes.