From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bat-mode: Inconsistent fontification. Consider using
 font-lock-function-name-face
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 21:10:40 +0300
Message-ID: <83blvt2vdr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <cfa93f75-bf75-788a-f9f0-ef38d956c2db@secure.kjonigsen.net>
 <vz1y2yxwxsm.fsf@gmail.com> <83ftl530zg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <a0b06da1-68b6-977d-7cc5-c88649962519@secure.kjonigsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="56892"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 09 20:11:41 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1i7O8a-000EgJ-AR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:11:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1i7O8X-0001zX-CM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:11:38 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56716)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1i7O7X-0001qj-L6
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:10:38 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40149)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1i7O7W-0008RS-Ig; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:10:34 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4404 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1i7O7V-0007L2-Dm; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 14:10:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <a0b06da1-68b6-977d-7cc5-c88649962519@secure.kjonigsen.net>
 (message from Jostein =?utf-8?Q?Kj=C3=B8nigsen?= on Mon, 9 Sep 2019
 19:34:44 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239961
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/239961>

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Jostein Kjønigsen <jostein@secure.kjonigsen.net>
> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:34:44 +0200
> 
> If the concept of a label is used consistently across many major-modes, maybe it would make sense to define
> this as a first-class font-lock concept?
> 
> Basically we could have an official "font-lock-label-face" instead, which by default would be derived from
> font-lock-constant-face. That way people who want labels to look more like functions can customize it on their
> end.
> 
> Would that be a better option?

I don't know, I never felt the need to distinguish them.