From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 14:29:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="28805"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 04 13:31:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKh1G-0007K7-IB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 13:31:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKh1F-0006M2-EP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 07:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKh0A-0005TA-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 07:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKh0A-0000Pn-MK; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 07:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4015 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jKh02-00025f-LL; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 07:30:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:10:43 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246390 Archived-At: > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 13:10:43 +0200 > > > (time-it (scroll-up) (sit-for 0)) > > To avoid confusion - what is 'time-it'? And please note that I did not > say that I ran 'scroll-up'. I did a mouse wheel scroll as the OP of > that bug requested and unfortunately I don't know what mouse wheel > scrolling does here because C-h k on it just gives me > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) > help--read-key-sequence() > byte-code("\300 C\207" [help--read-key-sequence] 1) > call-interactively(describe-key nil nil) > command-execute(describe-key) It runs mwheel-scroll. Not sure why it signals an error on your system. And if I turn the mouse wheel just one click, I don't see Emacs lagging behind, either.