From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Garbage collector: is 800kb a good default? Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:49:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83blnzmglb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o8s0on41.fsf@gnu.org> <87blnzh0wz.fsf@oitofelix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="98974"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dim1212k@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bruno =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix?= Rezende Ribeiro Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 10 18:49:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMwqn-000PeS-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 18:49:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jMwqm-0006OU-S9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jMwqI-0005tq-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jMwqI-0001Gy-Da; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:49:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4052 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jMwqH-0008Ve-Be; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:49:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blnzh0wz.fsf@oitofelix.com> (message from Bruno =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix?= Rezende Ribeiro on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:26:36 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246782 Archived-At: > From: Bruno FĂ©lix Rezende Ribeiro > Cc: Dmitrii Korobeinikov , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:26:36 -0300 > > > On GNU/Linux, Emacs doesn't really return malloc'ed memory to the > > system, so once the memory footprint grows, it more or less stays that > > way even after GC. > > Really? Why is that? Because that's how malloc/free are implemented in glibc.