From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU
 Emacs?
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:25:49 +0300
Message-ID: <83blnhb2oi.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com>
 <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com>
 <k545EYRnFmM53t5dfSgTrRhQoZ7LF95Cv5M84EX-_droZO9sKmXdlWYEW77BB29QSGkvG0JyHoMag9EMV3pbSdwXKwjehuxb5D_GbJeLBdY=@protonmail.com>
 <jwvk126t1ve.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <xjfk125ri2r.fsf@sdf.org>
 <CAC=50j9izxCMP0WTmpXuPMB6-=k9spfQCUGYFY3Fqt5oFjLHDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <xjf368tp8i3.fsf@sdf.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="25582"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: casouri@gmail.com, theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
 monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ndame@protonmail.com
To: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 24 12:27:40 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jRvYY-0006Ud-0l
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:27:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59340 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jRvYX-00030d-0T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:27:37 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33884)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jRvX3-0001gE-KK
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:26:08 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45013)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jRvX3-0003hu-9e; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:26:05 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1102 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jRvX1-0004Eq-IA; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:26:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <xjf368tp8i3.fsf@sdf.org> (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 24
 Apr 2020 08:56:20 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247685
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/247685>

> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:56:20 +0000
> Cc: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>, ndame <ndame@protonmail.com>,
>  Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
>  Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> I believe giving a little more responsibilities to developers is also a
> fundamental stimulus to involve them more.

Let's please keep this in perspective.  As shown on the project's
Savannah page

  https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/emacs

we currently have 209 people who can commit to ELPA and Emacs
repositories.  Does that sound like we don't give enough people
responsibilities and the trust to go with that?