From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 17:35:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83bln3ojit.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <83v9lesapw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbms9m8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a72qs4z2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wo5uqoh5.fsf@gnu.org> <838si9qf7s.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnblov3t.fsf@gnu.org> <6C836138-819D-4D1C-982C-72F49867997E@traduction-libre.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="4050"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, yuri.v.khan@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 04 16:56:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVcWK-0000vL-SI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 16:56:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVcWJ-00048W-RV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 10:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVcBz-0007nt-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 May 2020 10:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVcBy-000100-8J; Mon, 04 May 2020 10:35:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1231 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jVcBr-0006BR-4I; Mon, 04 May 2020 10:35:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6C836138-819D-4D1C-982C-72F49867997E@traduction-libre.org> (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Mon, 4 May 2020 16:35:53 +0900) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248831 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 16:35:53 +0900 > Cc: Yuri Khan , > Eli Zaretskii , > Dmitry Gutov , > joaotavora@gmail.com, > Stefan Monnier , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Considering that docstrings describe more functions than the manual does, would you think that working on the dosctrings for what you describe above would be better to expose emacs' APIs ? The doc strings cannot be used for this purpose, because they lack the information about the groups to which each function belongs.