From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:56:52 +0200
Message-ID: <83blbolecr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvft11mxc0.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvtuphlhdb.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org>
 <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org>
 <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="12334"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 13:57:29 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lKhM8-00036C-NP
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:57:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lKhM7-0007pi-PU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:57:27 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55896)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lKhLa-0007Bw-OH
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:56:54 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46557)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lKhLa-00035l-83; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:56:54 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4458
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lKhLX-00061m-Gf; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:56:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> (message from Gregory
 Heytings on Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:43:34 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266392
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/266392>

> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:43:34 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
> cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> I understand that you find the "C-x x f" not as convenient as "M-o M-o", 
> although it seems to me that for a not-often-used command, that binding 
> could be okay, but that's just me.  What do you think of the "C-M-|" 
> binding I proposed?

It's slightly better, although having to press 3 modifier keys isn't
easy.  Plus, it doesn't work on TTY frames.