From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hang in make check Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:33:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83blb0k659.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czvj65tk.fsf@gmx.de> <878s675vbj.fsf@gmx.de> <875z1bozjm.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1jznjyf.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtunnjjy.fsf@gnus.org> <83lfa6mup3.fsf@gnu.org> <878s66ns14.fsf@gnus.org> <834kgumd9s.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wemcdk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1jwn51e.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmzgkb4e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuos4tl1.fsf@igel.home> <83k0pok8y0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmzg4qp8.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14531"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: noloader@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 17:34:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRGOL-0003dC-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:34:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51426 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRGOK-0008RG-2s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRGNF-0007fS-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRGNE-0005af-3w; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:33:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1142 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lRGND-0001bS-EM; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 11:33:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pmzg4qp8.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:16:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267181 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, noloader@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:16:35 +0200 > > >> Perhaps that getchar call should be removed altogether? > > > > How will keyboard input be received then in those configurations? > > The same way as in all other configurations? After all, the majority of > the emacs installations don't include that block of code anyway. If tty_read_avail_input is universally supported without blocking, maybe we should.