From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:21:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83bl8echhu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <73ff18bf-66dc-7d7a-a0db-8edc2cdceba8@gmx.at> <83o8cge4lg.fsf@gnu.org> <62e438b5-d27f-1d3c-69c6-11fe29a76d74@dancol.org> <83fsxsdxhu.fsf@gnu.org> <179f22a44d8.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> <179f4b9f450.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14077"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 09:22:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lrF1X-0003Tc-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:22:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrF1W-0006jh-Iy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:22:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrF0T-0005tX-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:21:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrF0S-0006V7-62; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:21:36 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1859 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrF0M-00048f-2h; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 03:21:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <179f4b9f450.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:01:38 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270634 Archived-At: > From: Daniel Colascione > Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 00:01:38 -0700 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > The model I've had in mind for dealing with parse ambiguity is an > incremental GLR parser generating a parse forest, pruning the forest by > constraint solving on ad-hoc language specific constraints, then picking > one of the remaining parse trees incrementally to fontify. I'm not an expert in this area: is this different from what tree-sitter does? If so, what are the main differences?