From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 13:41:15 +0300
Message-ID: <83bl3xrwl0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="12050"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 10 12:44:36 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZWJo-0002xU-LO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:44:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZWJn-0005UK-KJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 06:44:35 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55376)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZWGp-00010R-RN
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 06:41:31 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49006)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZWGp-0006Lx-7Y; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 06:41:31 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3703
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mZWGo-0004CM-Eo; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 06:41:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8735p9jo51.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on
 Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:10:50 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276651
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/276651>

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 11:10:50 +0300
> 
> >> I think this inconsistency is unfortunate and unjustified.  Can we
> >> please move same-window-prefix to "C-x 4 5" for consistency with the
> >> equivalent frame command?
> >
> > Sorry, I meant "C-x 4 4" and other-window-prefix.
> 
> Please explain where do you think is inconsistency.
> 'C-x 4 4' is already bound to 'other-window-prefix'.

But other-frame-prefix is "C-x 5 5".  This is inconsistent with other
uses of these prefixes, specifically "C-x 5 2", "C-x 5 b", C-x 5 f",
which have their "C-x 4" counterparts.