From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eglot, project.el, and python virtual environments Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:14:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83bkp384sw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zgcq68zp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878rkale3l.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87v8nezf2k.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87o7t5k7sv.fsf@dfreeman.email> <86mt8p4221.fsf@gmail.com> <4cc918a053771a5e1c440cb4b458f3ed@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <838rk8d7xb.fsf@gnu.org> <6c389018-092f-9466-8f72-cf97d33adca2@yandex.ru> <838rk79ypx.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 19 14:14:54 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owNgM-00028P-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:14:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owNfr-0006mp-AA; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owNfm-0006mJ-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:14:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owNfl-0003PR-UK; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:14:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Gnlnm1dgo9a2phj5omQo2bZTtU99W+wM8lwxQbM8HlE=; b=Tp8uEKXGzfLx BtYqapGa7ZPcLyIgVYvULJLC8JZ3YZstLvJ0Ye5iyhmHNPdV/MU0/0vGAYrjXmxR7hExlOl7aaPQ1 L5IohXhSihtXkodfEg11dr53FcrXKyxYSPvaL7IFumt29xM/rWnkFEXzlsc6CGIUjKBIYJ2XtClIO hQwQaSLDjS84O6ANWTG0cBeYBxl2rR5FqxzAanhweczVib7B4oOxqSyOYKWZmRJLFzWLISdQb4sO+ HBQ/2AQsENGkm5TBmmEExzA2ei6VBFnftrVbtl/O84G9yqBR+3GRbLKmZ0fQ4cJsI3NTgPo4HF/qf XSIAr0GcJs6uTOiLD1R84Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owNfk-0004Ty-Cl; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 08:14:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:06:17 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300177 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:06:17 +0200 > Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > On 19.11.2022 09:42, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 03:12:21 +0200 > >> Cc:theophilusx@gmail.com,emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> From: Dmitry Gutov > >> > >>> I would also like to hear from Dmitry what are his thoughts on this. > >> That's my inclination as well, based on the requested behavior in this > >> thread. > > What is your inclination? I don't think I understand what does "that" > > mean here. > > My opinion is that if the users (as I'm reading in this thread) only > want to influence Eglot's behavior (WRT to subproject root detection), > but keep the bulk of project-related stuff (most importantly, project > commands) working as they do now, then that should be implemented in Eglot. > > If, on the other hand, they will want to use the newly introduced > "subproject roots" for more things... then that can bear further > consideration. Ah, okay, thanks. This basically matches my understanding of the issue.