From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Revamping bs.el Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83bko7phct.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v8mo7mnz.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7sg7lzk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilio7gq9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgbz4brj.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8mfpkqi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 14:24:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p55Gs-0006z5-IR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:24:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p55GU-0003fR-4b; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p55G8-0003X7-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p55G8-00059g-CX; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:23:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=5AvXPKmKYfWlZelfpOyMPH4n+R+Ft56Gc4iWPhs8mmM=; b=be+HCCmSfBYq sehVyBpkktp2Lh44SgkOr0Y2BH2fOTh5+GWSYbTsFTJsG7HubSmhMKwxfrMkxBYplbyqEg5XLoBi6 NX+mSljj9ZfjCKfN5MoubhIePI1nglmNjwlxlVS9H+qqDSycRZu9sDmfl1JIebeiAKjfQidgngWog l5VBoNNoxAmAWADZLUaGMEF4tsSX18IMUpPnX5Ng72zwYHJpEioquDL4s4muI4WgsXBUbnpk+IRk+ ARFGZw4Zsq97o/wYQDsfrORqpP88IPQLkNwKqgGB/ome7sgZKhrVzZnvN8XyyAX8gPWGHPbONEfRj yhyi8YKG4fFRlpLsqh3hVg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p55G1-0001aQ-3E; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:23:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:31:29 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301313 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:31:29 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I was wondering whether perhaps the docstring-only fix to bs-attributes-list should go in the release branch > instead. Documentation changes, let alone fixes, are always okay for the release branch. You don't need to ask about that.