From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EMACS_INT cleanup Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:58:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83aan7tksh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83aan8uvy3.fsf@gnu.org> <8339t0uthi.fsf@gnu.org> <831v8kurwd.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrqctcha.fsf@gnu.org> <83vd5wtc7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp7ntosd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285329550 27160 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2010 11:59:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 24 13:59:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz6vh-00067Z-HH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:59:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oz6vg-0003KG-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52364 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oz6vX-0003JG-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz6vU-0000s2-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oz6vU-0000rl-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:58:52 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L99004002LKSW00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:58:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.203.3]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L99004I42M0L860@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:58:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130758 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:02:43 +0200 > > void > message3 (Lisp_Object m, int nbytes, int multibyte) > > So we can only do a message that's 2GB big? Well, OK, but is that a > problem? Why bother thinking? Why not just replace int with EMACS_INT?