From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure with new configure.bat (was Re: Proposed change to nt/INSTALL) Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 10:53:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83aaezkkv2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4DC230CF.8070803@gmail.com> <4DC2994D.8020103@gmail.com> <83iptpm68b.fsf@gnu.org> <83tyd7lve2.fsf@gnu.org> <4DC47C3A.6060201@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304754817 17813 80.91.229.12 (7 May 2011 07:53:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 07:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 09:53:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIcKQ-0002Vd-Nd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 09:53:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38817 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIcKP-0001xx-UR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:53:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIcKN-0001xa-6F for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIcKM-0002Dl-1G for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIcKH-0002DG-2E for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 03:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKT00B00F5H5500@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2011 10:53:03 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKT00BB3F8D4G10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 07 May 2011 10:53:03 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4DC47C3A.6060201@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139190 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 16:54:50 -0600 > From: Christoph Scholtes > CC: Stefan Monnier , Emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So, I just did a `make maintainer-clean', configure, removed the > -DPURESIZE=5000000 from src/makefile and then did a `make bootstrap'. > > Everything builds fine. > > Does this mean we don't have to go through the two compilation cycles > during a bootstrap (once with PURESIZE, once without), but we can just > compile it once? If the first build does not complain about pure storage overflow, then a single build should be enough. > I would volunteer to adjust the makefiles to accommodate this. Thanks.