From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 11:54:31 +0300 Message-ID: <83aa1n57p4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> <83d36j59gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4uz58e3.fsf@sec.modprobe.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336208243 29558 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2012 08:57:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 08:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tom Rauchenwald Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 10:57:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQann-0000ep-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 10:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQanm-0003ep-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQanj-0003eg-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQani-0001Vb-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:51259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQanh-0001VL-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 04:57:14 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M3J00500KTCLU00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:56:32 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M3J0052CKU7DGC0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:56:32 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87r4uz58e3.fsf@sec.modprobe.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150276 Archived-At: > From: Tom Rauchenwald > Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 10:39:32 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Do these BEGIN_SRC and END_SRC marks serve some useful purpose in mail > > messages? > > In recent Gnus builds it will font lock that part off the message > appropriatly, making it look pretty. Thanks, but why isn't this done in general-purpose font-lock of email messages? Why limit this to Gnus?