From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using glib's g_file_monitor_file and g_file_monitor_directory Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:36:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83a9pfh0dh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjxxn6th.fsf@gmx.de> <87hajqpjn1.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365017790 31682 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2013 19:36:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Cloos Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 03 21:36:56 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTUO-0001SW-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:36:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTTz-0005Xd-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTTw-0005Ug-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTTv-0003DE-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNTTu-0003AY-O6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKP0090023VIB00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:36:24 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKP009DM2GN0HA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:36:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158621 Archived-At: > From: James Cloos > Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:21:20 -0400 > Cc: Michael Albinus , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > For comparison, the version of trunk on my workstation starts at 300M of > VM; the nox version of trunk Julien packages for deb starts at 58M (both > amd64 compiles) You mean, the memory footprint of "emacs -Q"? If so, I'm surprised it is so large. Perhaps this includes all the libraries mapped into the program? If so, I don't think you should count them, because other X programs are likely to share them, at least in part. The 32-bit w32 Emacs starts at 13M, FWIW.