From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Time to drop the pre-dump phase in the build?
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 22:30:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a9f3bmw0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140110152035.2889f2d0@anarchist.wooz.org>
> From: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:20:35 -0500
>
> Interestingly enough albeit tangential, I haven't even byte-compiled my
> personal elisp files in *decades*. I just load them from source
Did you measure performance? Byte-compiled code is about 2 times
faster.
> Performance (startup or runtime) hasn't been a problem since I made
> the switch.
If you are used to slightly slower operation, you will in time stop
paying attention to the slow-down. E.g., I run an unoptimized build
of Emacs most of the time (due to better debugging opportunities), and
think it is fast enough -- until I fire up an optimized build and am
amazed by its speed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 19:15 Time to drop the pre-dump phase in the build? Eric S. Raymond
2014-01-10 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-11 6:16 ` Paul Eggert
2014-01-11 7:17 ` Richard Stallman
2014-01-12 0:16 ` Nix
2014-01-12 3:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-12 3:53 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-01-11 7:17 ` Richard Stallman
2014-01-10 19:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-01-10 20:09 ` Eric S. Raymond
2014-01-10 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-10 20:20 ` Barry Warsaw
2014-01-10 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2014-01-10 21:06 ` Barry Warsaw
2014-01-10 22:19 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-01-10 22:58 ` David Kastrup
2014-01-11 0:05 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-01-10 23:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-01-11 0:07 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-01-11 2:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-01-11 3:37 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-01-11 5:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2014-01-11 5:30 ` Daniel Colascione
2014-01-11 16:14 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2014-01-11 20:13 ` Glenn Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83a9f3bmw0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=barry@python.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).