From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: admin/unidata updates Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:32:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83a98zptyc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vbrnsr7f.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403796807 22673 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 15:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: handa@gnu.org (K. Handa) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 17:33:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bfo-0001RN-Vr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:33:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bfo-0004uW-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0Bfg-0004sZ-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BfY-00014y-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:41892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0BfY-00014S-01; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N7S00D008921X00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:29:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N7S007VI8CDFP50@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:29:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87vbrnsr7f.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172756 Archived-At: > From: handa@gnu.org (K. Handa) > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:03:48 +0900 > > In article <834mz8rkix.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > How does one know whether a given script needs CTL? > > If a script requires CTL, I think that the section of that > script in The Unicode Standard should contain some > information. > > > The practical issue here is whether scripts added to characters.el > > (because the Unicode Standard added them) should also be added to the > > list of "simple scripts" in setup-default-fontset. > > As I wrote, adding them without specifying representative > characters is useless. But, as I have no knowledge about > recently added scripts, I can't provide such information. > So, let's leave the code of setup-default-fontset untouched. FWIW, I already added a representative character for each script I added based on Unicode 7.0.