From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:07:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83a8rk83ij.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54E0D7E0.305@87.69.4.28> <83h9unukbg.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0DEF8.7020901@dancol> <83egpruiyp.fsf@gnu.org> <54E0FF93.2000104@dancol.org> <5610ED13.1010406@dancol.org> <56117F37.9060808@dancol.org> <837fn127aj.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp0gx355.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp0g87mb.fsf@gnu.org> <83io6886k5.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv1c8553.fsf@gnu.org> <87io685aiy.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444928919 1518 80.91.229.3 (15 Oct 2015 17:08:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, dancol@dancol.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 15 19:08:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmm0z-00035G-12 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48723 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmm0y-0002HM-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:08:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmlzf-0001oC-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmlza-0007v7-Sq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zmlza-0007um-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NW900K00TZ12U00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:07:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NW900JKVU7OVZ70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:07:01 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87io685aiy.fsf@igel.home> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191666 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, dancol@dancol.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:03:49 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Andreas Schwab > >> Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, dancol@dancol.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:07:03 +0200 > >> > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> > >> >> From: Andreas Schwab > >> >> Cc: p.stephani2@gmail.com, aurelien.aptel+emacs@gmail.com, dancol@dancol.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> >> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 17:56:36 +0200 > >> >> > >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> >> > >> >> > Right, for pointers to simple data types, like 'char', 'short', 'int', > >> >> > etc., one needs to use Lisp_Save_Value. For pointers to struct's, XLI > >> >> > and XIL will do the job on the supported platforms. > >> >> > >> >> No, it doesn't. > >> > > >> > It does in Emacs. > >> > >> In which way? > > > > In the Right Way. The bits that need to be reset are reset. > > This is not guaranteed. I never saw it fail to work on any modern platform.