From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mark expensive tests Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8ol70fb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337vab7nx.fsf@gnu.org> <0d7fkmdxj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <566D0BEB.4010707@cs.ucla.edu> <52wpsif21j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <6tpoy9aorv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fuz54sfk.fsf@gnu.org> <566F5371.7010506@cs.ucla.edu> <87wprqzb0y.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <83si2d73df.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziwlpbbe.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451926320 18722 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2016 16:52:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 17:51:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8MC-000673-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:51:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8M8-0000jc-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48217) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8M4-0000jM-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:51:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8M1-0005ns-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:51:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8M1-0005no-Gy; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3131 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aG8M0-0002p8-Oo; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 11:51:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <87ziwlpbbe.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:19:01 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197611 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:19:01 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> I'd especially like the file-notify tests to move to #3, since these are what > >> consistently bog down my testing environment. > > > > file-notify-tests takes about 25 sec here, so I'm unsure why it should > > be in #3. Maybe that's because of remote tests (which are skipped on > > my system), in which case perhaps the remote tests should be separated > > into a separate test file and run on demand only. > > The most time consuming test is file-notify-test06-many-events. It takes > more than 4 minutes on my laptop: > > Started at: 2016-01-04 17:08:45+0100 > Finished. > Finished at: 2016-01-04 17:13:05+0100 > > I'm impressed that your supercomputer is that fast. Or do you test under > cygwin? Then this test is skipped. You are talking about the master branch. I was talking about emacs-25, where that test doesn't exist. So this long test should also go into #3. My main point was that other than a couple of very specific tests, the rest of the suite is quite fast, as test suites go.