From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 504696d: Etags: yet another improvement in Ruby tags Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:26:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8nfv1nz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160203162536.2954.45438@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <56B29165.3040404@yandex.ru> <8337t9xhjc.fsf@gnu.org> <56B31B99.6010400@yandex.ru> <83io24wfjl.fsf@gnu.org> <56B4329D.7010101@yandex.ru> <83mvrfv7s3.fsf@gnu.org> <56B47566.5090806@yandex.ru> <83d1sbv25a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454671598 24510 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2016 11:26:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dgutov@yandex.ru Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 12:26:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWw-000311-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:26:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47644 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWv-0004J9-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:26:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWs-0004It-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:26:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWn-0000yD-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWn-0000y9-JU; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:26:17 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1527 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aReWm-00018Q-VL; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:26:17 -0500 In-reply-to: <83d1sbv25a.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:15:45 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199375 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:15:45 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > But they might also look misleading, and indicate that we don't > > support the paren-using syntax intentionally. > > > > (It's another omission, but AFAICS nobody uses attr_XXX without parens > > in the context we're interested in.) > > If it's important to support that, it should be hard to add. ^^^^^^ I meant "shouldn't", of course. Sorry.