From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add facility to collect stderr of async subprocess Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:24:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83a8eilneg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <83egomxog1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ego5tjgt.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftno4fr.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <55247A98.5020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83r3rvgn4e.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftja89d.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87wphnwh2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> <87int7kpnt.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475688319 23062 195.159.176.226 (5 Oct 2016 17:25:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 17:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 19:25:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brpwM-0004q9-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:25:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brpwL-0000nL-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brpvp-0000nD-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brpvn-0006Ea-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:24:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brpvi-0006Cp-8l; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1348 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1brpvf-0001zf-Ng; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:24:28 -0400 In-reply-to: <87int7kpnt.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:20:54 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208014 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:20:54 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha > > Usually, start-file-process follows the argument list of > start-process. And the handlers for start-file-process do not use > make-process. How hard would it be to implement this functionality in start-file-process?