From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix use of sockaddr_in Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 22:29:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83a86g8siw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83shk989r5.fsf@gnu.org> <20170513150837.31184-1-phst@google.com> <83h90o8zt9.fsf@gnu.org> <877f1kefhi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494703803 18920 195.159.176.226 (13 May 2017 19:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 19:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: phst@google.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 13 21:29:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjl-0004kA-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 21:29:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjp-0004oX-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjg-0004oF-Pe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjd-0008FM-Ln for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjd-0008F9-IK; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1295 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d9cjc-0006zv-Em; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:29:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <877f1kefhi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 13 May 2017 21:14:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214831 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Philipp Stephani , phst@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 21:14:33 +0200 > > On Mai 13 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > The first hunk doesn't seem to be necessary, though: in both IPv4 and > > IPv6 structures, the port is at the same offset and has the same size. > > That isn't true for AF_UNIX addresses. Can that happen at this point in the code?