From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native display of line numbers, improved Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:57:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83a84wt8se.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tw35thxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87tw35cc70.fsf@rosalinde> <83injktb9p.fsf@gnu.org> <87k240xhk6.fsf@rosalinde> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498402657 30450 195.159.176.226 (25 Jun 2017 14:57:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 14:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 25 16:57:33 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yc-0007Oo-Qr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:57:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yi-0004dX-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yY-0004cQ-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yV-0004JZ-BJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yV-0004JU-7u; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2904 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dP8yU-00056V-Hm; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:57:19 -0400 In-reply-to: <87k240xhk6.fsf@rosalinde> (message from Stephen Berman on Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:34:01 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215960 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 16:34:01 +0200 > > > I'd prefer to leave the code > > simple, without all kinds of subtleties whose sole purpose is to add > > minor aesthetic sugar. > > It's not a big deal for sure, though it seems at first sight unintuitive > that if the buffer ends with a sequence of newlines, all but the last > will be numbered (especially when the last one is also numbered in the > mode line). Well, if you turn on indicate-empty-lines, that last "line" will be clearly indicated as empty. Anyway, let's see how many people are annoyed by this before making a decision.