From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please explain the FSF copyright assignment thing Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:59:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83a847h82w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87shi08bx5.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87o9so86pf.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500012042 19518 195.159.176.226 (14 Jul 2017 06:00:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 06:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 14 08:00:37 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVteW-0004bI-SH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 08:00:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVteZ-0004uJ-6s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 02:00:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVtdr-0004uD-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVtdm-0003LD-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVtdm-0003L4-4U; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:59:50 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3874 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dVtdl-0005y4-Iy; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 01:59:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <87o9so86pf.fsf@wanadoo.es> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?car?= Fuentes on Thu, 13 Jul 2017 21:42:04 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216631 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 21:42:04 +0200 > > You are taking this the wrong way: Richard's request is a compliment, > not an attack. > > If org-mode were not distributed with Emacs, I'm sure Richard would be > requesting the same about that package. > > > Happily the community has rallied to Jonas' cause and will now try to > > bring Magit into the FSF fold. > > What "cause" is that? Richard wants Magit into Emacs core, which Jonas > agrees with (with some caveats, some of them unfounded, IMHO). *If* that > goal cannot be accomplished, Richard's alternative is to develop a new > package for the same purpose. I can't see why Jonas or anyone else could > be offended by someone starting a competing project. > > Really, guys, you are making a drama out of nothing. Well said. 100% agreement.