From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 20:05:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7ug1d06.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> > <<87sh89fsxl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87o9iw3lak.fsf@linux-m68k.org>> <<83lge021r1.fsf@gnu.org> <83efjs1nnc.fsf@gnu.org>> <<83bmew1mu5.fsf@gnu.org>> <0f2ceaf4-b85d-4bd8-a42b-e99374de832a@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523034299 17736 195.159.176.226 (6 Apr 2018 17:04:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 19:04:54 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f4UnG-0004Wr-1r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 19:04:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4UpL-000366-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60613) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4UoD-00034Z-Qw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:05:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4Uo9-0001Q1-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f4Uo9-0001Px-79; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1446 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f4Uo8-0000R0-Eg; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:05:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <0f2ceaf4-b85d-4bd8-a42b-e99374de832a@default> (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:52:43 +0000 (UTC)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224408 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 15:52:43 +0000 (UTC) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > M-: (length (x-list-fonts "-*-*-normal-*-*-*-13-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1")) > > RET > > > > where the "13" part could need a change, if (face-font 'default) > > reports a different pixel-width of the default font on your system. > > That gives 3506, for me (substituting 14 for 13). That's 3 times the number I get here. Which could well be the reason why you see so slow redislpay in some cases.