From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:53:02 +0300
Message-ID: <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3r28xrfl9.fsf@gnus.org> <m3o941dwq7.fsf@gnus.org>
 <m3a7fldvjn.fsf@gnus.org> <m34l5tdu4i.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-8cm76XUD8SuKF2jMNb_gwc0q_jxWs8nuth==_a1jo44w@mail.gmail.com>
 <m35zpurjs3.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-_=RrOFobrdnzdYBWVZ8v2DSQJzpi2Mbsa2E3gL3kDBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3ef4iq0pd.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV--Rvb0RFRfpP4u348U0-EAcN-NLVfEzTRkE9Rc7RAacWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <m38suqq03h.fsf@gnus.org> <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m3lfyqobq7.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV--MF1oCYQ+BFX=PW27ZMYEPzxajkGb0oo7msVidHD-Ceg@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3d0k1o6gl.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimtttg8t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3ftoi3m5o.fsf@gnus.org> <m3blz63j41.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-85nAR_vHoXhmZfuu1ndfK-6FVopzKMbwtfDmm7gkU7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <m336ki3ghd.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimteipi7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3v9xezi75.fsf@gnus.org> <m3r282zfjx.fsf@gnus.org>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="87041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 17:14:12 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1haiTT-000MUB-OO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:14:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60056 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1haiTS-0006g5-BP
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:14:10 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48200)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1haiFs-0007fz-3u
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:00:10 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47481)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hai91-0000cb-27; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:53:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4448 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hai90-0003EN-7J; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:53:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <m3r282zfjx.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 
 09 Jun 2019 22:09:38 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237433
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/237433>

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 22:09:38 +0200
> 
> OK; I think the feature is now er feature complete -- it works, and it's
> documented and there's even tests.
> 
> So if somebody can take a look at the scratch/with-suppressed-warnings
> branch and see whether it works for them, and possibly critique the
> code, that'd be nice.

I took a cursory look, and I have no significant comments.

Thanks.