From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Line wrap reconsidered
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:14:55 +0300
Message-ID: <83a71uvic0.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <92FF4412-04FB-4521-B6CE-52B08526E4E5@gmail.com>
 <878shfsq35.fsf@gnus.org> <F01B488F-B62C-4B30-AFB8-272FA5E9032C@gmail.com>
 <BB8A36F8-EB55-4AAE-B01B-97E50CFF9106@gmail.com>
 <6795D9A1-904E-4C6F-AE86-9EDD52718F01@gmail.com>
 <090B0FA5-2AA6-4134-BB8B-3FD9BFCC5AA0@gmail.com>
 <522C17DE-71ED-45E1-BB66-62C041804AA7@gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="22831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 17:15:55 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jdbJ4-0005r5-DT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:15:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55946 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jdbJ3-0003Ht-De
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:15:53 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45992)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jdbIL-0002JK-Md
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:15:09 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45892)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jdbIL-0002yp-BC; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:15:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1987 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jdbIK-0001hS-DS; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:15:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <522C17DE-71ED-45E1-BB66-62C041804AA7@gmail.com> (message from
 Yuan Fu on Tue, 26 May 2020 00:46:01 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251456
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/251456>

> From: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 00:46:01 -0400
> Cc: emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> Besides efficiency concerns, using text properties allows use cases described by Ihor, where user can
> customize on what to wrap and what not to. That seems nice.

I wrote there that I didn't understand that use case.

If we don't actually need the text property, avoiding it is
preferable.  However, make sure the category table can be made
buffer-local.