From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New
 package: vertico
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:34:50 +0300
Message-ID: <83a6q53pxh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <cfe162e2-6094-836b-ca91-4e8af3944dac@daniel-mendler.de>
 <9c9af088-580f-9fb1-4d79-237a74ce605c@inventati.org>
 <p91sg44r3c4.fsf_-_@google.com> <874kgkxxs0.fsf@posteo.net>
 <87blamp5hy.fsf@posteo.net>
 <2ce73f33-8675-211a-9eb7-ea63de1a161e@yandex.ru> <871rbh6pd4.fsf@posteo.net>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="38672"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 11 15:36:30 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lVaGM-0009xX-7E
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 15:36:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lVaGL-00081H-79
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:36:29 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36276)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lVaF7-0007HB-Id
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:35:13 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33587)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lVaF6-0000Uw-Q1; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:35:12 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2131
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lVaF2-0006hk-B7; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:35:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871rbh6pd4.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on
 Sun, 11 Apr 2021 13:18:47 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267873
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/267873>

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 13:18:47 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> But this raises a more general question, of whether selecting-read and
> completing-read should be drop-in replacements of one another.

I think they should strive to, because it's conceivable that we will
have a user option to determine which one to call where currently we
call completing-read.