From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump (redux) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:09:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6puryjw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5decf0e7-8f26-3fc7-7094-1bfdb211eefc@emvision.com> <83k0p0vjgn.fsf@gnu.org> <0aa226dd-50e3-ec62-e0ac-2b9194c3d90d@emvision.com> <831rb8uiv0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0p02efn.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87zgxu7juf.fsf@igel.home> <279d1651-55f7-9cd6-4f6b-7616676beca4@emvision.com> <83tuo2s9g1.fsf@gnu.org> <83mttus5hs.fsf@gnu.org> <1bf535b8-ca77-0eb6-9ac3-029b686b3671@emvision.com> <83eef6s1v8.fsf@gnu.org> <5a17d91a-ff30-785d-3587-78838d46fd88@emvision.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20752"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, ali_gnu2@emvision.com, rms@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com To: Ali Bahrami Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 19 19:12:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lYXRO-0005Hv-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:12:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYXRN-0003ng-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYXPT-00027Z-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYXPS-0006ZC-ID; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1563 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lYXPK-0004ci-45; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:09:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5a17d91a-ff30-785d-3587-78838d46fd88@emvision.com> (message from Ali Bahrami on Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:08:49 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268184 Archived-At: > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, rms@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Ali Bahrami > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:08:49 -0600 > > > The "paradise lost" I alluded to is that with native-compilation, when > > you modify Emacs and rebuild, some of the hashes in the *.eln files' > > names could legitimately change, and thus cause you to update the > > manifest. > > > > When you say "modify emacs", that's a source change, > and not just a rebuild, right? Yes. > If so, that's not a problem for me, because I create a new manifest > in that case already. Then you shouldn't have problems with emacs-FINGERPRINT.psmp names, either, and the whole discussion of this sub-issue was based on a misunderstanding. > What I consider paradise lost is if the fingerprint > changed just because I rebuild the unchanged sources. It doesn't.