From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: ls-lisp.el handle --group-directories-first flag Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 18:43:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6mbzpia.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335se5v40.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2a64bla.fsf@gnu.org> <83czrh40hf.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8asynga.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0lgymsd.fsf@gnu.org> <83im0zzzhq.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 24 17:44:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m7JpM-000AFK-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 17:44:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7JpL-0002AO-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7JoV-0001Uc-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:43:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7JoU-0002CO-Bf; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:43:42 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1659 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m7JoS-0002fN-GW; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:43:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Arthur Miller on Sat, 24 Jul 2021 16:58:08 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271549 Archived-At: > From: Arthur Miller > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 16:58:08 +0200 > > >> > Btw, in my testing, with ls-lisp-dirs-first bound non-nil, the > >> > directories are shown in their correct alphabetically sorted order. > >> > So I'm unsure what problems you saw and in which scenario. Can you > >> > tell more about this issue? > > When I was testing, if ls-lisp-dirs-first is nil, and > --group-directories-first is specified, dirs come out in reverse order > in new buffer. Just reverting the buffer didn't show this. I don't know > why it is so. Because --group-directories-first includes 'r'? > If you are OK with the patch2, then here is one without -U on top of > that one. I take it that the problem with the reverse order doesn't exist? Or does it still exist and needs to be debugged? Thanks.