From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:33:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6ittp5r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <874k94j3rn.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91kzydh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh4holf.fsf@gnus.org> <822aec9d01909cecfc6c@heytings.org> <87a6iwhltf.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuh4zfg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26gfobr.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuh4f1ie.fsf@gnus.org> <0353A9DA-0041-4D71-8E1B-09FB07A5FD0F@acm.org> <87ilxialzw.fsf@igel.home> <831r46wj6r.fsf@gnu.org> <83fssmuxui.fsf@gnu.org> <83bl3aux6y.fsf@gnu.org> <835ytiuvm9.fsf@gnu.org> <834k91vgie.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c5fa370d9eaf@heytings.org> <83mtmttsxz.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c56b7b2d1d6f@heytings.org> <83bl39tqnl.fsf@gnu.org> <8ff3b131c531f5254799@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40079"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, raman@google.com To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 28 12:48:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mg2xu-000ACI-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:48:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35558 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg2xt-0005Hg-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg2ic-0008P7-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg2iY-0003zG-BG; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:33:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=8i5GIrg0gDWY2QemounoB+dUto4FpbU9IDuAA6s4eOY=; b=cHbYldLF0VBROYsc02AQ Kjjc7ThSCkLWM4yFCoN8FzaT45IwCACZJnGEj3CVy8XsWCKpgvrrnCM+S6X0EgaMQVhpyQvQgXfrl S0gVCaBd8ZyeRAg8hQLyin5Pzi4dNsgUXlMEr+cME9bKOpMnXeqg4qXnUviKOtpgSU4yO7DLEKebo 6GWINoyYJjTJAc8LFVmpVuU2DEmo/yhE6mTfJX7EINW7M7cUqUnw805WUktk9+VTtTHojLQt5xbvj kEKIECAVPAeZotuXIua+Ntfx0zMCgirDheuHk7jWbGFzaO96hVAsU/asW8VQKb+EZfHj7Ya4dAHf7 EhHblKvn4bHWnw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3045 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg2iW-0001fp-2m; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:33:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8ff3b131c531f5254799@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:05:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278083 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:05:31 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: mattiase@acm.org, raman@google.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, > stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Hmm... it seems you removed U+13430 VERTICAL JOINER? Why is that? Is > > it only because removing them yields the correct display, or there's > > some deeper, non-phenomenological reason? > > Indeed, it's because removing them yields the correct display with both > LibreOffice and hb-view. Which I guess means that it's the correct > string. But I'm not an aegyptologist... There are examples of hieroglyph formatting in section 11.4 of the Unicode Standard: they show the sequence of codepoints and the expected display. Do these work correctly with that font? I mean figures 11-2, 11-3, and 11-4, as well as tables 11-2 and 11-3. Here, we are free from the need to be aegyptologists, since Someone™ did the work for us.