From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 61a312ba0c: Update last event time during DND operations Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:44:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6abpo1q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fsk3pyke.fsf@gnu.org> <87iloz3cqn.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22345"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 12:49:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o29XE-0005Ya-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:49:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53322 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o29XD-0000Kt-3W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o29Sf-0006gA-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o29Sf-0006aM-AT; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:44:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BQ8Z9+IGnGcEXO0MQjOwV+1LkXtZbZGMFXTJv2DmQ4k=; b=NqwDfs4hMYhI TxU0EvBra4SX8cpM8FRQ1wJczaPNlFuVsXSiMQlcEYOtFp81B7eR1g1nxtRgJeBF5xU9DHKG+IPZf y22TcxYPNjQJ7WoRqBIXxrPDkBUJD0TH73YNvEysn3ncTGDblHoF57qOKsRoSmw7gHF6am+l9epIO ETlR3axog9OCN8ormdjrmZAGZfaCAjd3nIF9IkCUUNkUrjj4Iko+8YELBIhDX8DRsv9NBk3sLI4BI 7+kU2KTckAyTWLRN26liAEZGYg3Cp9AhncDsVZ1mlHa1xCbmHXy4af+YJ6z05BuX5+ttwsvfx6TWe lsFm5sCWX02WOMUw/83jxQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3768 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o29Se-00020t-Q2; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:44:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87iloz3cqn.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:39:28 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291287 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 16:39:28 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This doesn't tell the details about what object could TERMINAL be, > > like the other callers of check_x_display_info do. Is this > > intentional? doesn't this function support all the possible types of > > TERMINAL argument the other callers do? > > It should, but I think it is obvious that it accepts the same terminal > objects as the other functions. Obvious to you and me, perhaps, but not for Lisp programmers that don't read the C sources. So I think this doc string should say what other doc strings of functions that accept a TERMINAL argument say.