From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Which face to use for highlighting interpolation delimiters? Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 16:30:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83a62vvipb.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38661"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dev@rjt.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 15:31:01 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pDnkL-0009s8-FX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 15:31:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDnjm-0008Oe-9C; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:30:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDnjl-0008NQ-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDnjj-0001cY-Rr; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:30:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1xlpyekKD+/gbwTpeCHP5L+Pk7l0S3VZQjRr+kg8GAQ=; b=ns+B+7iisoIA gGCVkIcHwRMuszDV5nDIdk1Cp679fgD69A9TnOBlr573vB4umDdP7Q2Gb7sa4ajAaLsrJxC70rbNJ h2cr25SoP8GM5MqCPgfJaEMG3f67hiB5aiXMuA7hbGOqSh9wY/qNoFu3lkFqcJJ3nXrqOJIwmo7N9 50gdx+OWPwQK7T8BsWqxD3NV3Z7XshVLUmuP3X/DdHNLC+fE7jkgNpn23RMGKFGBe6INjcX5QqBao JDT9087KHhWlhlN/3QaA6NBkOhHdOA5gBbnuNSXmoM9EXWnX95Qna8mEfKkOvbGk4FvD6lvyqaX4L 6RHF5yLiGtdT9QnxHLaZkg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pDnjj-00014E-2t; Fri, 06 Jan 2023 09:30:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:50:02 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:302253 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:50:02 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel > From: Dmitry Gutov > > >> While we're at it, maybe a face for regexp literals as well? > > > > Sure. > > Eli, could we still add that in emacs-29? We'll make it simply inherit > from string and use in a 2-3 ts modes for languages with regexp > literals. It's a pretty trivial change. > > If we defer it until Emacs 30, it will be kinda painful to use in > ELPA-distributed packages (e.g. python and hopefully ruby as well). In general OK, but please show the patch to add that, so I could know exactly what is being proposed.