From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation and gc Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:33:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83a60gu0ma.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i.ref@Ergus> <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i@Ergus> <87a60k657y.fsf@web.de> <838rg4zmg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttys4dge.fsf@web.de> <83sfebyepp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttyru4zt.fsf@web.de> <83fsabyb41.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt4jtpqf.fsf@web.de> <83ilf7wi48.fsf@gnu.org> <878rg3wh2f.fsf@localhost> <87a60jtg0z.fsf@web.de> <877cvmumjq.fsf@localhost> <83356aukkh.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1o2t45i.fsf@localhost> <83wn3mt33c.fsf@gnu.org> <873568d7ac.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10917"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 13 16:34:43 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkCB-0002bA-7y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:34:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkBW-0004vY-4N; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkBT-0004uS-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkBT-000424-4F; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:33:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=sfwVJLl7keBIrLVJ3DejT/eS+wRO3IBP0Zj1fvJhM3g=; b=iAoImKNAH6+o 1gODDoNg3F11uwCz+EGnpXXrG4/GpUIXBE4jE6c6/o2ecASx1LB1VZrbP89xMqDlMe+FFKp/jBcW5 o/wLhcmdf+gm78kvrJAigatWg6k8/Rp1qoO4M/p752g3cP0HtEY6f15UhapG6vEzCNPOTPl32/CZ+ QANUeXV7m1dhYOcmtQnyrZe3wxKiq2M01ALUywRi7XKSsU6M7j5/H0O71dnkUCRIQE98veTnF0vL/ WETSvnuCauLQJTBXrWQhOoh/wuIK+xIkaHq//6aLBgla4paL6HfdKcZ5DO/gGI0CeHuESJVU0B0aP bLo1E4hj7Txm2A9kRx+s0A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkBS-0002dF-GH; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:33:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <873568d7ac.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:01:47 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304398 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:01:47 +0000 > > >> Indeed. But despite all of the best efforts, fragmentation increases if > >> we delay GCs, right? > > > > Not IME, no. That's why the memory footprint of a typical > > long-running session levels out. > > Then what is the mechanism of gc-cons-threshold affecting the Emacs > memory footprint? Because higher threshold increases the probability that some free memory couldn't be released to the OS.