From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep network security info buffers after use Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:05:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83a5q6ibqu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87plz4irev.fsf@red-bean.com> <834jggk4t9.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7eoe7f1.fsf@red-bean.com> <83ttofifaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87frzzkqmc.fsf@red-bean.com> <83jzpaid6o.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31672"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 14:06:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rFZnp-00080J-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:06:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFZnF-0003rV-HG; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFZn8-0003nK-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rFZn5-0001IT-RL; Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:05:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=5/NmDtBPwc1iT50kZ2N0t4G0svvjfygSwGugTQhovGU=; b=JvL5lRssdpNX 4UF8NMQOHU8rpqGMFYLDG58Fkg0RkviYCLP849ArIs5b0zgPY6+EJsjaDV1z/+VJKWqk0RyDRpT3W 4NDNd19lkLRNGHBfBsGGXlz1fI+7gs9696U/CePIMRUk3PhkLfRfsfn7l455x/yTpnvWXvo3NTH4B DuXEvRXtI6ZJTuNzVZtpcacZAzu2YZC06hvhPszIbdLT4bXCFBb4z5R6DxfsOOsDz0Z3OKX4/cftT miz3DPOBmYulA291lUbk8DI/v8Kn53bR1TKCl+cn/jYvijD/uLu7TruckGMx2CQ8WIpKyQ0DuROyi RI7kV/WiDS27z6LOITb1lg==; In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314005 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:50:14 +0100 > Cc: Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Karl Fogel > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:00:59 -0600 > > > > > > On 18 Dec 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > > >We don't advertise that key for a reason, so I don't think this > > > >is a good idea. > > > > > > Okay. I'm curious what that reason is, if you have time to > > > explain, but I'm fine accepting this decision as a given. > > > > The reason is simple: what you see is a side effect of how the user > > interaction was implemented in this case [...] > > That would be C-r. The question was about C-r, so that's what I answered. > What impedes the (for this "dumb user" here) "most > obvious" path, i.e. changing to that buffer with C-o and copy things > into the kill buffer to inspect them later at ease? The fact that rmc.el is a modal dialog, AFAIU.