From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: exec-path and PATH Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:36:58 +0200 Message-ID: <838vw9a5qt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86ipvfiyp0.fsf@gmail.com> <83vczfr0o0.fsf@gnu.org> <86ei63hxsz.fsf@gmail.com> <83tyez9g3n.fsf@gnu.org> <86wrjuhous.fsf@gmail.com> <83pqpmakt0.fsf@gnu.org> <86vczdeftd.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300653432 1117 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2011 20:37:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 21:37:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1PN3-00059c-BQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:37:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60492 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1PN2-0000TN-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34772 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1PMt-0000Rq-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1PMs-0005Io-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:63362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1PMr-0005Ii-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LID00I00IKIS800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:36:53 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.131.120]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LID00IOVILFEQ50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:36:53 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86vczdeftd.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137456 Archived-At: > From: Christoph Scholtes > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:45:50 -0600 > > However, now I wonder why we have a facility like exec-path at > all. Wouldn't the process-environment's PATH be enough? Because working with a list is much easier than with a single string?