From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Killing a frame sometimes kills emacs Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:29:26 +0300 Message-ID: <838vq8e0x5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d3flnxoo.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <83fwkhdld0.fsf@gnu.org> <871uw04lr9.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87sjog35jj.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4E5F7ECD.9060601@swipnet.se> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314891093 30909 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2011 15:31:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tassilo@member.fsf.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 17:31:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz9Em-0004jE-IB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:31:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41271 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz9El-0003ip-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz9Ej-0003ik-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz9Eh-0002tT-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:49639) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz9Eh-0002ss-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:31:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LQU00C00OB9V700@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:29:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.83.44]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LQU00C9XOD0UH20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:29:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4E5F7ECD.9060601@swipnet.se> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143692 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:47:09 +0200 > From: "Jan D." > CC: Andreas Schwab , Eli Zaretskii , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From Emacs point of view, localhost:0 and unix:0 and :0 are three > different displays, even if they physically are the same. Can't we do something in Emacs so it understood that they are on the same display? That won't fix the GTK problem, but at least it will work around it in this particular use case. And I think it's a Good Thing in general, no?