From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Possible new display bug Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:53:56 +0300 Message-ID: <838vp4d2dn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838vpktifx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317491690 14134 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2011 17:54:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 17:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 19:54:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RA3ls-0007DC-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:54:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA3lr-0004Y1-He for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA3ll-0004Xf-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA3lh-0005JB-F4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RA3lh-0005Ix-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:54:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSE00400EQOVS00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:53:57 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.229.231]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSE004PYF1WFED0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:53:57 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144518 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:36:12 +0200 > MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1318091775.61063@wbRskF8kn+B91ur5w1lehw > > It finally happened again. `M-x redraw-display RET' fixed the issue. > > So Emacs is not redrawing certain parts of the display? It probably means Emacs is employing some redisplay optimization when it shouldn't. > It seems to be reproducible for me right now, but it involves using > Gnus to view blog items that have images in them. If you can make a reproducible test case starting from "emacs -Q", I could try looking into it.