From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 26b56dc: Fix some single quotes in documentation Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:43:36 +0200 Message-ID: <838u1kdhnr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160314154123.2684.74715@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <56E6E764.9090500@cs.ucla.edu> <89ba6063-e962-7590-39be-c4fb28f394ea@yandex.ru> <56E703D9.8000607@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457981071 8623 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2016 18:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 14 19:44:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTc-0001Jg-4w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:44:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43398 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTb-00087E-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTN-00086q-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTJ-00037a-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTJ-00037W-OX; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2797 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1afXTI-00021y-0s; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:44:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <56E703D9.8000607@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:32:57 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201739 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:32:57 -0700 > > Alternatively we could revert commit > 4235d2d9eaa3b64d3172f6c60f1e71704795af89 and go back to straight quoting > 'like this' in etc/NEWS, as was done after my first patch today. That > would be adequate too, even though (as John said) it is less consistent > with the rest of the documentation. The main point is that grave quoting > `like this' is not right in user-facing documentation. I'm okay with quoting 'like this'.