From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Performance degradation from long lines Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:08:43 +0300 Message-ID: <838t2loz1g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lg6mqdfh.fsf@gnu.org> <87va5pkxae.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83mur1p3oj.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2gdkvl6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83in1pp2ct.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9bhku9m.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83d0rxp02k.fsf@gnu.org> <87lg6lkrtq.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540544805 29737 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2018 09:06:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mithraeum@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 26 11:06:41 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy4n-0007eN-FW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:06:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59017 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy6u-0002Wa-0q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43578) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy6n-0002WH-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy6k-0004Bf-ML for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy6k-0004BY-HO; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2898 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gFy6k-0000kt-4L; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 05:08:42 -0400 In-reply-to: <87lg6lkrtq.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:58:09 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230700 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: mithraeum@protonmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:58:09 +0800 > > Sorry, I meant no offence there. None taken. > I just wanted to say that, if possible, we should try to find > workarounds for non-file buffers. Agreed. > Ideally, these workarounds should work in all the non-file buffers > without a need to address the issue for each buffer type separately. I suggest to file a bug report specifically about backtrace buffers with long lines, preferably with an example. I think it is an important special use case for which we could implement a good solution that is relatively simple and effective.