From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v2: Fixes to allow erc-dcc-get-filter to work properly
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:32:41 +0200
Message-ID: <838syeky7a.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CD36F2CB-49E3-4441-AEAF-DD6B62B1CF13.notmuch@neverland>
	<3FCFBDED-9040-41B1-9686-30773CA6EC08.notmuch@neverland>,
	<837ee1o461.fsf@gnu.org>
	<087AD903-C49F-4D5A-A136-2ED030F4C6E5@duke.edu>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="127625"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Victor Orlikowski <vjo@duke.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 20:33:20 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1gvSBk-000X5Z-JT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 20:33:20 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45758 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1gvSBj-0005BI-GY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:33:19 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40735)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1gvSB4-0005B1-PL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:32:39 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60303)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1gvSB4-0004wa-Gl; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:32:38 -0500
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2002 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1gvSB3-0005fz-SB; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 14:32:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <087AD903-C49F-4D5A-A136-2ED030F4C6E5@duke.edu> (message from
	Victor Orlikowski on Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:57:16 +0000)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233434
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/233434>

> From: Victor Orlikowski <vjo@duke.edu>
> CC: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:57:16 +0000
> 
> Regarding my other patch (for properly backgrounding ERC's reconnection attempts) - should I re-submit, with attention to complying with contribution guidelines?

I'd suggest first to wait for someone to review it.

> Also - what do I need to do to have it further considered for acceptance? IIRC, you had asked for a willing volunteer to review/test it, since you yourself do not use ERC.

Yes, I don't consider myself an expert enough on ERC to review the
patch.  Perhaps try finding someone who knows more than I do, not sure
where to look, to tell the truth.  Sorry.