From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Question about display engine
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 19:11:46 +0300
Message-ID: <838spolj5p.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20191012222305.jpjinkd5y2lz6xiv@Ergus>
 <83mue5kmfx.fsf@gnu.org> <20191013154052.yzluijtwvf2ppvks@Ergus>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="261035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 13 18:12:08 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1iJgTY-0015pF-GJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 18:12:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1iJgTW-0008Lt-CK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:12:06 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42412)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1iJgTK-0008Lg-JE
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:11:56 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60981)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1iJgTK-0000Dv-6K; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:11:54 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3497 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1iJgTJ-0003uM-In; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 12:11:53 -0400
In-reply-to: <20191013154052.yzluijtwvf2ppvks@Ergus> (message from Ergus on
 Sun, 13 Oct 2019 17:40:52 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240969
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/240969>

I wrote:

> Could it be that redisplay_window_0, or some function it calls,
> signals an error, which is caught by internal_condition_case_1?  What
> happens if you put a breakpoint in signal_or_quit, does it get called
> from redisplay_window or some other function called by
> redisplay_windows?

Actually, it is better to put a breakpoint in redisplay_window_error.