From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 05:25:57 +0300 Message-ID: <838sca3lqi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> <20201009203810.GC4027@ACM> <83imbi609a.fsf@gnu.org> <20201010103233.GB5662@ACM> <834kn25o6b.fsf@gnu.org> <20201010124446.GC5662@ACM> <831ri65jpc.fsf@gnu.org> <83zh4u44mx.fsf@gnu.org> <83imbg4yl3.fsf@gnu.org> <837drv4ij6.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vvz0q2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16068"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 04:26:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSA1N-00044S-7c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 04:26:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSA1M-0002ai-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:26:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSA0g-00029r-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54907) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSA0d-0001KR-PI; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1127 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kSA0c-0006S7-Cs; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:25:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k0vvz0q2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:46:29 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257509 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: Gregory Heytings , acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:46:29 +0300 > > AFAIU, the problem is following: typing more characters at the end of > the minibuffer enlarges the minibuffer window when the minibuffer grows > longer than the frame's width. The question is why the minibuffer window > is not enlarged when an overlay is added at the end of the minibuffer? It isn't related to the overlay, it is related to the fact that max-mini-window-height is set to 1.